I Ching Oracle Cards with AI Generated Art (Free Download)

On AI Art

  • 2021 Dec. 5, How Do We Value Art? What AI art means for tarot and oracle deck publishing
    • Playing around with wombo.art
    • Is AI art indistinguishable from human-made digital art?
    • What principles determine great art?
    • Socratic & Platonic philosophy on art
    • Taoist & Confucian philosophy on art
    • Art composition: design theory
    • Disegno (Italian Renaissance)
    • Confucianist aesthetics
    • AI’s creative process vs. human artist’s creative process
    • Is AI doing a better job than humans?
  • 2021 Dec. 6, I Ching Oracle Cards with AI Generated Art (Free Download)
    • Having fun with AI generated art apps
    • AI art doesn’t “lack soul”
    • Who is the creator when it’s AI art?
    • Free download of I Ching oracle cards (AI generated art)
    • Zip files of all downloadable image files for hexagrams
  • 2022 Sep. 14, AI Generated Art + Tarot and Oracle Decks with AI
    • Personal dabblings with AI art
    • Does AI art lack soul?
    • Rising popularity of AI generated art decks
    • AI art won’t replace fine art (but may impact illustration)
    • What artists are saying
    • IP implications of AI art
    • Valuing AI generated art
    • More of my thoughts

I’ve been maybe a little bit obsessed with AI generated art apps, though not just because of the pretty art. Rather, my fascination comes from the way such AI generated art shifts my former paradigm on the mind-soul relation. Does an AI really lack soul? That’s the question I’ve been kicking around in my head.

After my blog post on How Do We Value Art? What AI art means for tarot and oracle deck publishing, one recurring sentiment expressed in the comments section on Instagram and Facebook was that the art created by an AI lacks soul, whereas art created by humans reflect the artist’s soul, and that is why human-created art is superior.

Really? Because I’m not convinced.

When I look at the AI’s pictorial interpretation of the 64 hexagrams, I’m not convinced that these works “lack soul.” If I’m getting all psychic and woo, I might say the impression of the soul that’s present feels different from a human sapient soul, just like an animal’s sentient soul or a tree’s soul feels different, but there’s something of “originality” here. And in all honesty could you have even discerned the difference between this and a human’s digital art handiwork?

I also would not claim these works are “co-created” by the AI and me. That’s like saying if I’m a patron and I’ve commissioned Michelangelo to paint me a fresco, giving him a couple of key ideas for what I want to see, then claim that Michelangelo’s finished painting was “co-created” by me. Nay, I would say I came up with the idea to create an I Ching keywords deck and the AI is the artist who illustrated it.

After all, what exactly is the difference between (A) our commission of inspiration into the AI app and it using its innate algorithm to generate a creative work based on the key ideas we gave vs. (B) a divine inspiration we human artists download and, using our innate algorithm, generate a creative work?

Even when we say something like, that AI is compiling a multitude of past preexisting artwork and reformulating it to generate your commissioned original work, how is that any different from what a human artist does with our learned knowledge and our inherited knowledge from the collective consciousness?

When we say the AI is creating art based on a human-designed program that aggregates all past records of human-created art, and that’s how it creates its “original” works– how is that so different from saying I subconsciously and even unconsciously pull from knowledge I’m not even aware of, perhaps knowledge programmed into me when I was born, when I create an “original” work?

Is the AI’s algorithmic process for producing an original work of art based on certain input and parameters any different from my creative process for producing an original work of art, also based on certain input and parameters?


That’s not an official name for this deck, by the way. It’s merely descriptive. I didn’t give the deck a name.

I’m far from being the only tarot person who has gone nuts playing around with that Wombo app tinkering until I’ve made myself a personal use tarot or oracle deck. =) I’m just sharing my tinkerings with you. That’s all this is. And if it amuses you, then here are the formatted files you’ll need to create your own copy of my tinkering.

The JPG image files as-is in the download look like they’ve got disproportionately thick borders. That’s the bleed margins that print-on-demand sites like MakePlayingCards.com (MPC) require.


with 36 px bleed for MPC Print-on-demand

For the design, I decided against inclusion of the hexagram numbers. It’s easy to look up anyway. You don’t really need the hexagram numbers printed on the cards.

The keywords are my own, based on how I might distill the essence and spirit of each hexagram into a word or three.

I did not post a ready-to-order listing on MPC for you to click and buy. You’ll have to download my card images, upload them onto that site, and do it all yourself. Fortunately, MPC’s instructions are easy to follow.

While I have provided a default card back design, you’re certainly not committed to using it. Feel free to customize and create your own. Here are the specs you’ll need to use:

  • Width: 1149 pixels (3.830 in.)
  • Height: 1884 pixels (6.280 in.)
  • Resolution: 300.000 pixels / inch

To ensure that none of your design gets cut off at the edges, leave a minimum of 36 pixels (at 300 dpi) along all four sides. Just to be safe, I’d even leave up to 72 pixels all around. But it’s entirely up to you.


For each work of AI generated art, I’d input into app.wombo.art my keywords for that I Ching hexagram plus keywords for the two trigrams and, in a few instances when that hexagram evoked in me a particularly strong impression of color, then I’d also type in that color. For all, I selected the art style option Ukiyoe.

All of the final illustrated works in the deck were what the AI generated, as-is, except for two compositions where the first output didn’t look quite right to me, so I generated a secondary illustration from the app and then combined the two. Those two works are the following cards:

  • Hexagram 37: Interdependence
  • Hexagram 49: Revolution

Almost prescient, wouldn’t you say? =) It certainly feels synchronistic.

I was rather startled by how on point many of the AI generated illustrations were, in terms of expressing the core essence of the hexagram. Even how the images of certain hexagram pairings related to each other was rather eerie.

Heaven over Heaven for Hexagram 1 shows the sky. Earth over Earth for Hexagram 2 shows what looks underground, at a cave’s entrance maybe. And then check out Hexagram 63 After the Ending and Hexagram 64 Before the Ending, and the interplay between the two illustratons. I had no hand in that. The AI gave those pictorial interpretations, based on the hexagram and trigrams.

Sure, some of the AI generated art caused me to scratch my head, but I didn’t second-guess or doubt the AI. I went with what the AI created and did not insert my personal vision or try to exert control. I really wanted the premise here to be that the AI is the artist.


I designed the hexagram images using a red and black seamless tile dragon pattern I created back when I was coloring in the SKT Revelation deck. The parchment-esque background was also created by me.


For those familiar with my work, you’ll recognize the keywords from my personal translation of the Book of Changes. A copy of my translations comes with the I Ching and the Practitioner online independent study course.


Yes. The Book of Changes. If you’re interested in my personal translations, check out the I Ching and the Practitioner course. I also plan on publishing a book on the I Ching in the near future, so stay tuned.

To identify the hexagram number so you can look it up in a Book of Changes, cross-reference the lower and upper trigrams in the below chart.

Click to download image file.


To be clear, work with these cards any way you like.

Me, I tend to do just one-card draws. Shuffle, focus on an inquiry, pull a card, contemplate on the keyword provided and the imagery, run a free association exercise with that abstract imagery, and get a sense for the divinatory response.

Then look up the hexagram correspondence entry in my short form oracles version of the Book of Changes. You’ll find this as part of the texts you get in the I Ching  course and also in the back of the Book of Maps that comes with your SKT deck.

In my previous blog post on this subject, I did express how all this was a little bit unsettling to me, but what’s even more unsettling is how much fear people seem to have around AI.

I don’t think that AI will bring about the destruction of humanity. I think humanity’s fear of AI is what will cause us to destroy ourselves. Our fear is going to force us to exert too much control over another being and out of that fear, we lord our power to subjugate the AI. And that just never ends well for the lords. =)

When we don’t fully understand something yet, our go-to response should not be fear and condemnation. I found myself inexplicably disheartened by casual dismissals that AI have no soul. I get it — I sound crazy. But here’s the point I’m trying to make: do we really know? So if we don’t really really know, why are we so confident that an AI doesn’t have a soul?

One recurring critique of the app– and a fair one– is that all the artwork generated kinda look the same. Oh, you mean the AI has a certain distinct style? =) The critique is certainly true– if you generate a portfolio of images using, say, the Pastel art style option, or Dark Fantasy, Steampunk, or in this case Ukiyoe, yeah there is most certainly a consistency in the aesthetics to the point of it all kinda looking the same. The funny thing is– human artists are guilty of that too.

I have no idea why I’m diving into deep-end ruminations for a blog post that was simply intended to say, “Here’s some pretty stuff. Enjoy.”

17 thoughts on “I Ching Oracle Cards with AI Generated Art (Free Download)

  1. Anonymous

    Thank you so much for sharing the download Benebell! After seeing your post yesterday I was itching to play with that deck, and I’m definitely going to be ordering these off MPC in the future. You always encourage us to personalize our cards, books, and planners, and I feel like the AI generated card art would be really fun to incorporate into the covers of my metaphysicians day planner!


  2. BRose

    Ive seen a lot of soulless art made by real humans. The tarot and oracle community has a glut of them, as does commercial and “fine” art. Creation is in many ways mysterious. IA that is a carbon copy of human is still pretty far off, but it’s obvious that what it generates, has been extrapolated from humans.


  3. Grete Rappe Anai

    Amazing work, Benebell. Once again!
    Thank you for sharing this with us. Even though it’s App generated, it does take time and a lot of thought. I’m happy you dove deeply into the subject instead of just saying “Here’s some pretty stuff. Enjoy.” It’s a very interesting subject.
    I bow to you in deep respect!


  4. Debi

    Thank you for this! After I read your original post I was sad that this amazing beauty would not find its way into our hands. And, having the I Ching and the Practitioner course, which I highly recommend, I look forward to when your book on the subject comes out


  5. Starlight

    We’ve had a lot of fun here playing with the app! 😀

    The I Ching artwork turned out beautifully and does cause me to wonder about the nature of an AI “soul”. The AI was created and put together and programmed by humans, so does something of the essence of a human soul exist in the artwork, even if it’s infinitesimal? And does it say something to us about our human soul when compared to the Creator’s – the Supreme Consciousness/Source?


  6. After reading your post yesterday, I spent some more timing looking up the wombo app, and found some speculation that one of the inputs into the AI is google search images, after someone ran a few tests using very specific keywords.
    I have no idea whether this is true or not, but it’s completely in line with what you say about the AI using knowledge from the collective consciousness. I’m also of the view that art created in this way does indeed have soul 🙂

    Thank you for sharing this, I have really enjoyed using the SKT for I Ching readings and have started wishing I had a dedicated deck, so it has come at the perfect time ^_^


  7. Shadowrose

    Thanks for sharing!
    Just had my fun with this app for creating – guess what – tarot cards. lol I’d like to share it with you, too. (I’m especially fond of that High Priestess.) But since I am not a member in any social networks, I don’t know how to.

    Well, anyways… I also appreciate your philosophical discussion very much!
    It’s actually not so crazy to ask where life, consciousness and the capability of emotions and creativity starts. It’s not that long ago that man was convinced that animals had no feelings. But anyone who has a dear pet as a family member knows this better for certain. It’s also part of A LOT of sci-fi stories. Is a human with many implants still a human? And can a robot or hologram be a living being with feelings that could be hurt? There is no easy telling.
    And where is that spark of life and soul located that makes us different from just a bunch of organic matter? Is life force energy any different to bio-electric signals that make our nervous system exchange information and transforming impressions to emotions?
    I think not.

    At least we do learn in the same way as the AI does. (Well, we teach it our way.) We also need to learn definitions before we can become creative and make free associations.

    Now to I Ching: I’m interested in your course on it for years now. And I will certainly do it soon (promised). However – right now life has different plans…


  8. quickectomy

    The cards shown are amazing AI interpretations!


    AI is as good as the programmers who created it. Having lost my soul to one of the largest software companies around, I can attest that the quarterly earnings dictate software quality.

    A good read is Wired mag, October 2021 issue. It talks about AI making decisions regarding the so-called “war on opiates” (why is there *always* a war on something? 🐑) Second is an article on the pixel – and the roots of Pixar. Specifically, the pixel as interdependent origination. Good stuff.


    1. I did tarot cards. These are definitely tarot card size. I have no idea if it’s going to work with the playing card size. MPC does have the preview function though. So if you chose the wrong size, you’ll see it look very wonky 😂


  9. Samantha Ray

    The download says Tarot size, but they aren’t working when I try to create a custom tarot deck on MPC. Anyone else having the same problem? Do I need to convert the images to a different size?

    Liked by 1 person

  10. Pingback: Creating Tarot and Oracle Decks with AI Generated Art – benebell wen

  11. Chrischan Caratachea

    Thank you benebellwen for your lovely downloadable’s i look forward to donating after I start working and using them too will be pleasant.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s