The Playful Heart Tarot and the PipSpeak Tarot by KittenChops
You may be familiar with the Playful Heart Tarot by Kitten Chops (Zaara), based on the RWS, whereas the latest creation from the KittenChops studios is a Marseille-based pip deck, the PipSpeak Tarot.
After completing the RWS-based Playful Heart Tarot, Zaara redefined her work with the tarot by unpacking her RWS framework and re-learning the tarot with the Marseille. The result is the PipSpeak Tarot, which became a liberating experience. Likewise, this might just be the very deck to get a seasoned RWS reader out of a rut.
From the little white book (LWB) for the PipSpeak Tarot
“Fortune tellers and cunning folk have been reading with Marseille and playing card/pip decks for hundreds of years,” writes the artist. “Instead of esoteric intellectual prowess, these readers have been relying on their common sense, their understanding of human nature and key card reading wisdom passed down from generation to generation.”
If you’re from the corporate world you might have heard of the Six Sigma quality management methodology or the acronym DMAIC blah blah but even if you haven’t, no worries. This is just a tarot spread inspired by Six Sigma principles and that process flow of D (Define), M (Measure), A (Analyze), I (Improve), and C (Control).
This card reading method (it’s workable with an oracle deck, not just tarot) is less in the space of mysticism or divination, and more in the space of pragmatism and driving you to be a more creative and critical thinker.
2025 is poised to bring rapid technological advancements with artificial intelligence, an increasing need for global response to climate change, continued escalation of geopolitical conflicts, and deepening societal faultlines, with much of that all but written in the stars.
Let’s talk about general global forecasts for the year to come. We’ll cover the following:
If you haven’t been watching the 2024 Marvel TV series Agatha All Along, it’s a spin-off from WandaVision focused on the character Agatha Harkness. And the episodes have been chock full of tarot (and witchy) goodness.
I love how the online tarot community is currently having fun with a fictional but bona fide tarot spread in the show, named the Safe Passages spread, a key feature in Episode 7 (“Death’s Hand in Mine”). It’s got Celtic Cross vibes in the formation of a pentagram.
(Ignore my graphic above; I squished all the card positions together, which is why you can’t really see the pentagram anymore. In the TV show, the pentagram shape is more pronounced.)
Just a head’s up: there may be spoilers in this blog post, but nothing too major; I’m focusing on the tarot parts.
This article is for one who has already built a solid foundation at reading astrological birth charts and is now interested in giving professional chart readings to the public. Having done professional chart readings for the public for the last 12 years, I’ve learned a great deal from my experiences and have tweaked, refined, and streamlined an effective approach, which I’m now sharing with you.
General Overview vs. Addressing a Specific Subject
First, make sure both you and the client are clear on what type of birth chart reading the client wants.
Are they new to natal astrology and want a general overview of their chart’s key highlights, in which case you will be touching in on all the major topics, i.e., personality profile, strengths, weaknesses, career, love, money, health?
Or does the client want you to assess their birth chart and deep-dive into one specific area, i.e., analyze their chart for career metrics, analyze their chart for prosperity metrics, or tell them about their black moon Lilith placement and how Lilith impacts other natal placements?
I had set the timing to 30 minutes for a reason. It’s a digestible amount of time for both astrologer and client. However, it also means you need to manage that time. As you probably know already, a birth chart can take you down any myriad number of immersive rabbit holes, which just does not make sense to go down in a 30 minute reading.
Personally, even for a general reading, I like to get a sense for what my client wants to know about, or which placements they’re already familiar with and not so familiar with, that way I can make the best use of our time together. If they’re an intermediate astrologer themselves, then I’m not going to spend much time explaining their sun, moon, and rising, and instead get into some of the more obscure placements. If they hardly know what their sun sign is and didn’t even know the ascendant was a thing, then yes, we’re gonna begin with sun, moon, rising.
Preparation
I do think you need to prepare in advance of the actual delivery of insights. Or, if it’s a situation where you get the chart and then need to start interpreting it right away, before you begin, give yourself a few minutes to study the chart and jot down key notes. Why?
A birth chart itself covers so much ground and has so much to say on every facet of the native’s life path, that if I don’t jot down key notes to anchor myself, I can get lost in the weeds. At least for me, if I don’t take a minute of quiet study to outline main talking points, I’ll end up rambling about all sorts of tangential “fun, nerdy” features in the chart that may or may not interest the querent, and also, if you ramble on too many tangents, it’s going to make it harder for the querent to connect the dots and leave with any cohesive takeaway points.
Your preparedness essentially determines how productive and cohesive the client’s reading experience from you will be.
Level-Setting at the Start
These are going to be prepared, even canned remarks that you always make at the start of a reading session, unless it’s a repeat client who is already familiar with your style and approach.
Mine are along the lines of, hi, I’m going to be reading your chart in Whole Signs Tropical. I’ve learned to do this preemptively because sometimes clients who have previously seen their charts but in Placidus only will freak out.
Then you cover your personal philosophical approach as an astrologer. I think this is important because astrologers vary. This level-sets with your client. So, for instance, I’ll say something to the effect of my approach to birth charts is as a divine strategic plan mapped out for you at the moment of birth, but you choose your own path, and when all is said and done, you make your own fortune. That’s because challenges you were born with can be overcome, and blessings you were born with can be lost.
By the way, this is something you can get out of the way before a session, at the time a session is booked. My preference is to get all this preliminary level-setting to a client way in advance of a booking.
Open with a Sound Bite
Begin the 30-minute reading by stating your thesis, or what stood out to you the most about the native’s chart. Be able to summarize it in a few sentences, something that will be a memorable takeaway for the client.
Admittedly, this seemingly no-brainer lesson took me a long time to learn. Astrology can be overwhelming, and as an astrologer you’ve already devoted so much of your learning to the technical elements of astrology that it doesn’t even feel technical to you anymore. You can just rattle off what you’re seeing in the chart, one thing after another, and get excited, but from the client’s perspective, you’ve covered way too much, and now they’re overwhelmed. They recall that you said a lot, but can’t pin down anything too specific.
So beginning with that “best of” in a sound bite is going to help frame the reading session.
House & Sign Approach vs. Subject by Subject
When I say “House & Sign,” I mean that your approach to interpreting a birth chart for a client is to, say, start with the ascendant and talk about the implications of what’s happening in their House 1 and the zodiac sign ruling it, then move on to House 2, then House 3, all the way around the wheel.
The “Subject by Subject” approach is to have a set skeleton outlining the topics you will be covering and then just interpreting the key placements addressing taht topic. For example, you start with personality and disposition, so cover the sun, moon, and rising, and then generally gloss over any of the personal planets and key sensitive points that go toward personality profile. Then you talk about love and romance, and explain what the chart has to say about that, then career metrics, health, personal spirituality, early childhood, adulthood, fears, hopes, etc.
Which approach an astrologer prefers is a matter of subjective opinion and style, I think. Personally, I will choose which approach best suits the type of astrological reading that is being requested, and maybe even choose which approach based on what I intuit the client wants from me.
If you are a pro astrologer who will be offering written readings, I would recommend drafting a boilerplate template for both approaches, then selecting which template to start with based on the client’s specific needs.
House & Sign Approach
For the House & Sign Approach, I would just go in sequential order starting from House 1. Start by explaining what House 1 in a birth chart reveals about the native. Example: House 1 in your chart typically represents selfhood, your destiny in the making, capacity for self-development, and even physique.
Then identify the zodiac sign ruling the native’s first house, what that generally tells us about the native, and then get into the planetary occupants, plus any key personal sensitive points. For the ascendant house specifically, I’d also mention chart ruler and then quickly cross-reference to talk about that planet. Close with any notable angular aspects that the planets or sensitive points in that house are tethered to.
Pros: This approach gives the client a very comprehensive map of their birth chart and what every horoscopic piece of the sky pie says about them.
Cons: For a client who is not very familiar with astrology in general, the house & sign approach can be overwhelming. Also, depending on how much you want to cover about each house, 30 minutes might not be enough.
For a chart reading on a narrowly-tailored specific subject, such as the client wants a deep-dive into what their chart says about life purpose, in the House & Sign Approach, you would simply filter the assessment of each house through that specific lens.
Subject by Subject Approach
For the Subject by Subject Approach, have a prepared outline template. For example, (1) Personality Profile (focusing on a reconciliation of the sun, moon, and rising, and perhaps Mercury implications on their way of thinking), (2) Prosperity metrics (focusing on the second house, Jupiter, Lot of Fortune, and eighth house), (3) Career Potential and Social Status, (4) Love and Romance; Compatibility, (5) Pursuit of Happiness (fifth house, to address their personal approach to creativity), (6) Inner Shadow, Weaknesses to Work On, Areas for Personal Development, and any other specific areas you as an astrologer like to focus on.
Pros: Let’s be candid with each other here, this approach hits directly into what the client wants to know, and is structured in a digestible format.
Cons: It is my opinion that this approach is less conducive for the client learning any core astrology basics. This approach feeds them the most immediately relevant information about their life path that they would want to know, but they won’t come away with any astrology 101 know-how with respect to what each house in the chart says about them.
For a chart reading on a narrowly-tailored specific subject, then in applying the Subject by Subject Approach, the outline of what to cover would be sub-topics within the specific subject.
Uncommon Placements
As a seasoned astrologer, you’re going to immediately spot the uncommon features in a natal chart. When you scan the chart holistically, what stands out the most? A grand trine? Stellium? Grand cross? All the planets congregate on just one hemisphere? A whole lotta retrogrades going on? [And before an astrologer slides into the comments to say, “Well actually,” yes, sure, what constitutes “uncommon” is quite the range.]
When to address uncommon placements is probably going to depend on how the reading is going, and what your preferences are as an astrologer. Maybe you start with these observations before getting into the House & Sign or Subject by Subject approach. Maybe it’s something you bring up mid-stream when it’s relevant. Maybe you close with it. Or more likely, it varies from reading to reading.
I just bring this up because at some point during the 30-minute session, I think it’s useful (and entertaining) to directly address uncommon placements and talk about its implications. Everyone wants to know what’s uncommon about their birth chart, what makes them unique. So I would say it’s an important point to highlight.
How Much Astro Lingo to Use
This is, of course, an ever challenging balance to strike. A stereotype that astrologers get is using too much technical astrology jargon. Sometimes, a client just wants to know who they’re most compatible with or what their chart says about optimal career paths.
Maybe they’re not interested in you rattling off all their angular aspects, implications of decan rulership, or that their natal Mercury cazimi in Virgo.
Or…maybe they are. Because unique and uncommon astrological features are going to be of interest to a client, because we all want to know the ways we are extraordinary. 😉 And some clients are extra nerdy and want to know all the technical things.
So I don’t necessarily have any one-size-fits-all tips or advice here, except to say that as a pro astrologer, be ever mindful of striking this balance.
The Conclusion, or Closing Remarks
I find it helpful to close by reiterating that opening sound bite you gave, recapping the three most notable points you covered during the reading, and if it wasn’t covered already, a summary note on dominant modality, elemental balancing, and chart shape.
Also, leave a few minutes at the end for follow-up questions. Then, the final imprint you leave the client with should be something that feels like an affirmation, is positively validating, or an empowering, motivational takeaway message.
Although I am not of the mind that one should be nice-washing and being superficially positive, the style of your delivery of the information should be empowering, not disempowering. You can deliver bad news but still do it in a way that preserves the querent’s sense of control and fuels their willpower. If a chart reading does not do that for the client, then in my opinion, there is no reason to be giving a chart reading. A chart reading is purposeless without imparting upon the client an actionable plan.
Difference Between a 30-Minute and Hour-Long Reading
I mean, it basically comes down to scope. A 30-minute reading means you’re going to give just the highlights reel. An hour-long reading is when you can dig a little deeper and also include more angular aspects, or go beyond the standard roster of planets and talk about asteroids.
My reason for bringing this up is to remind you of how you want to approach time constraints. You don’t want to approach a 30-minute reading the same way you would approach a 60-minute reading, because if you do, you will run out of time during the 30-minute reading, and become repetitive and run out of things to say during the 60-minute reading. So be ever aware of the time constraints.
I also find that, incidentally, there’s a bit more education involved during the hour-long session, where the querent will also receive the bonus of actually learning a thing or two about astrology basics. Whereas I don’t think that inclusion of material belongs in a shorter form reading.
Birthed during the global pandemic, The Fool’s New Journey Tarot is a 60-card deck that reorganizes the familiar order of the traditional 78. “Sixty Triumphs for a New Dawn.”
First ten trumps of the Fool’s New Journey
Per the deck description on the box: “In 2020, the world changed. The arrival of a worldwide pandemic ensured it could never be quite the same again. In the same way, facing new issues at every level of life, it is time for Tarot to change. The Fool must begin a new journey.”
“The Fool represents the soul of everyman . . . and goes through the life experiences depicted in the 21 cards of the Major Arcana,” wrote Eden Gray over half a century ago. The Majors, noted Gray, were like archetypes of the subconscious.
But why only these 21 cards of the Majors, as depicted by Pamela Colman Smith no less, as the immutable model for every tarot deck produced?
Trumps 50 – 57 in the Fool’s New Journey
So begins the questioning that led to The Fool’s New Journey, a new sequence of cards that speak with the archetypal voice governing all beings on earth (to borrow language from Caitlin Matthews).
Second decade of trumps in the Fool’s New Journey
John Matthews then collaborated with artist Charles Newington for these new archetypal tarot images. Together, the two set out to create imagery that would be stripped of the traditional imagery as much as possible, and to keep these picture cards simple. Matthews then set these images into a new order, a reset of the tarot.
These 60 trump cards present a new look at the tarot, literally a new journey for The Fool. And yet it’s funny that we think of this as a diverging path from traditional tarot, because in its heyday, circa 15th and 16th centuries, we had the Minchiate Tarot of 96 cards, the 50-card Mantegna, which was also considered a tarot, and the quite popular pre-Golden Dawn Etteilla Tarot that has an ordering of the Majors to confound today’s RWS readers.
Cards 1 through 5
The journey of The Fool represents the journey of life itself, and so the premise here would be that we, the everyman, all begin before The Maze (Key 1). In the natural course, we then must embody The Believer (Key 2), but before we can move into the role of The Magician, we must confront The Shadow (Key 3). If The Magician is skill and cleverness, The Priestess (Key 5) is wisdom and intuition. I love that in this New Journey, The Priestess is Key 5, what had been the traditional position of The Hierophant.
“When rationality runs dry, it’s Red that will reconcile this world, a hue vibrant and vital inside its brown.”
And so opens Chapter 1, Zero, of Red Tarot: A Decolonial Guide to Divinatory Literacy by Christopher Marmolejo. This is going to be a tarot book like no other. I can tell already. :: hearts for eyes ::
“To be born, this work broke open my heart, and so let this reading be opened by my blood offering, a requisite pound of flesh…”
Marmolego’s writing is going to draw out your feels, that’s for sure. Either you will be fully onboard this train or you will be left scratching your head. You’ll see what I mean. Let’s continue.
Red Tarot is not an easy read, but it’s not intended to be. It’s filled with dense layers covering symbolism, mythology, history, present day politics, literature, and so much more. This book is about shedding red light on each card in the tarot to reveal it as a prism of political praxis, inspired after Prof. Sandy Grande’s Red Pedagogy.
Each tarot card entry draws from four key disciplines:
literary fiction as political expression,
gender studies and theory,
anti-colonialist philosophy of education and decolonizing pedagogy, and
performance studies, whereby theatrics, divination rituals, ceremonial rites, and social expressions are revelatory of core truths in the human experience.
This is achieved by weaving in the teachings of Toni Morrison, bell hooks, Paulo Freire, and José Esteban Muñoz.
I previously showed the above in a #54321tarot tag. Whether you get the coins or cards, if you’re interested in the 72 angels correspondences, there’s a free download from me at the very end of this walk-through.
The download is so you can do a direct comparison between the 72 angels and tarot correspondences per Christine Payne-Towler’s Tarot of the Holy Light and the tarot correspondences per Frater Setnakh.